There’s been a lot made this week about David Davis’ principled resignation from the Shadow Cabinet and from Parliament, so he can fight a bye-election against himself. And maybe Kelvin Mackenzie. Which given that in a bye-election fought between Kelvin Mackenzie and Satan, Mackenzie would lost his deposit, isnt’t turning out to be that much of a stand.
And if you look more closely at Davis, it’s not turning out to be that principled, either. For sure, I agree with much of what he’s saying now. No to 42 days internment without charge. The insidious spread of CCTV, and the uses to which its being put. The attempts to introduce compulsory ID by stealth. Ever-expanding DNA databases of people who have committed no crime. The appalling misuse of laws passed to protect freedom and fight the terrorists who as we know are RIGHT BEHIND YOU, RIGHT NOW, laws used to arrest people reading poetry outside Parliament or shouting tremulously at a Labour Party Conference. All very good stuff, and all bang on the money over the chipping away at liberty which has been the hallmark of this government.
“Up until yesterday, I took the view that what we did in the House of Commons, representing our constituents, was a noble endeavour because we defended the freedoms of the British people.”
Sounds good, hey. But I find it hard to get behind Davis the crusader. Perhaps it’s because, despite all his impassioned defiance of the extension of detention without charge to 42 days, he voted for the extension to 28 days.
“We acknowledge that the world has changed since the IRA halted its terror campaign. New technology brings new security challenges. As the Home Secretary said in relation to the National Technical Assistance Centre, the police and security services need more time to scour CCTV footage and to crack encrypted messages. The international dimension of Islamist terrorism also brings new challenges. That is why my hon. Friends made it clear in Committee that we agree with the Government that the current 14-day limit is too brief and propose its extension to 28 days.”
The sacred point at which this all becomes an unwarrantable crushing of liberty, insult to the magna carta, blah blah blah, must presumably lie at some point between 29 and 42, then. For voting yes to 28 days using the same arguments the government are using now, but throwing his toys out of the pram over an extension to 42, Davis is a hypocrite.
I also find it hard to rally to the call for freedom when the person making it is an enthusiast for the state killing people. It’s a bit rich for Davis to talk about mistakes made and the impact of innocent people imprisoned for 42 days when if he had his way innocent people would have been barbecued in the mercy seat - Stefan Kiszko, the Guildford Four, the Birmingham Six, Colin Stagg…if Davis had his choice, they’d all have been dead in the ground long, long before their innocence was proven.
Whether it’s Section 28, opposition to gay rights like equal age of consent and civil partnerships, or opposition to the Human Rights Act, Davis has long been on the side of those who would diminish freedom
All of which is why I find his recent conversion a little unconvincing.
Tags:
civil liberties,
conservatives,
david davis,
freedom,
liberty,
Politics,
terror,
UK